| |
Low emissions
intensity animal production
a case for the narrative to reflect the facts
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
It is well known that
NZ produces some of the lowest emissions intensity dairy products, lamb and
beef in the world. This means that any reductions in NZ production that
reduces its relative position in key export markets is in fact contributing
to increases in global emissions.
This is a glaring anomoly in the UNFCCC approach (of country by country
micro solutions) that remains unchallenged by our policymakers. NZ's greatest
contribution to minimising biogenic emissions globally is to increase production.
This is the opposite to current policy.
There is a clear statement in Article 2 - Objective (also repeated in the
CCRAct 2002) that, in relation to emissions reduction, includes the words,
"to ensure that food production is not threatened".
NZ supplies the world with over 30% of traded dairy products, ie cross
border, and 62% of traded lamb making both sectors extremely significant.
|
|
| |
To illustrate the
benefits of NZ's low intensity production, the analyses below looks at three
main agriculture sectors, dairy, lamb and beef. There are links to the source
information.
|
|
| |
About dairy analysis
|
|
| |
The table below shows
(i) the GHG emissions per kg of milk and (ii) the volumes produced in the
stated countries.
In calculating the emissions benefit of NZ product in relation to other
countries listed in the analysis, each has been weighted based on their own
production quantity. This limits the influence of a small producer with very
high product intensity.
There are two ways of using the table below. From the Countries menu, you
can select "User define", to have the option of selecting you own
group of countries. Otherwise we have set up some pre-set groupings.
There is then a second analysis that weights the domestic emissions in each
export markets based on the volume we export to them. This calculates the net
benefit in GHG Global emissions terms, of NZ being a producer and exporter of
dairy products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
KgCO2e /kg milk
|
Cow milk
|
NZ Benefit
|
Export %
|
|
|
|
|
|
million mt
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
NZ
|
|
21.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
USA
|
|
101.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
India
|
|
87.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
China
|
|
34.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Germany
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
France
|
|
25.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
14.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italy
|
|
12.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canada
|
|
9.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ireland
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denmark
|
|
5.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sweden
|
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uruguay
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portugal
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Benefit factor, more
versus less production
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Global emissions
benefits from NZ dairy exports
|
|
| |
Exports by country 2020/21 (user definable in
previous section)
|
|
|
| |
|
KgCO2e /kg milk
|
NZ CO2e benefit
|
Exports volume %
|
|
|
|
|
| |
New Zealand
|
|
|
|
NZ produces 21.9 m mt of
|
|
| |
China
|
|
|
|
milk each year.
|
|
| |
Australia
|
|
|
|
While this is 3% of global
|
|
| |
United States
|
|
|
|
output, it is 30% of cross-
|
|
| |
RoW
|
|
|
|
border supply, ie
exports.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Lamb exports based on UK intensity
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The following
analysis for lamb has been based on newly released (Nov 2022) research
commissions by Beef and Lamb. The comparison is based on the on-farm
emissions from UK versus NZ. Other
research has suggested other European countries have greater product
intensity than the UK.
NZ supplies over 62% of the traded (in cross border) lamb in the world.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Kg CO2e /kg Lw
|
|
UK
|
|
Lw to Cw
|
|
|
| |
Kg CO2e /kg Cw
|
|
UK
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
|
Lmb processed
|
|
m (#)
|
|
kgcw ave
|
|
|
|
|
Exported
|
|
Cw
|
|
k mt
|
|
|
|
| |
CO2e
Benefit
|
|
m mt
|
|
of NZ agricultural emissions
|
|
| |
Benefit factor, more versus less production
|
|
CO2e/kg
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Beef exports based on USA intensity
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Given that a
substantial volume of NZ beef (38%) goes directly in the USA and most of the
balance competes with US exports to those markets, a benefit analysis based
on USA alone in appropriate.
|
|
| |
Kg CO2e /kg Cw1
|
|
USA2
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
| |
|
Exported
|
|
k mt Cw
|
|
|
|
| |
CO2e
Benefit
|
|
m mt
|
|
of NZ agricultural emissions
|
|
| |
Benefit factor, more versus less production
|
|
CO2e/kg
|
|
| |
|
1 = latest NZ study; 2 = Asem-Hiable et al., 2018 (page 10)
|
|
| |
Summary of emissions benefits from NZ exports
|
See detailed
analyses
Close View
|
|
| |
(Derived from the analyses above)
|
Factors
|
|
| |
Dairy
|
|
m mt of CO2e
|
|
|
|
| |
Lamb
|
|
m mt of CO2e
|
|
|
|
| |
Beef
|
|
m mt of CO2e
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
m mt of CO2e
|
|
(weighted)
|
|
| |
Conclusion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Contrary to the long
espoused narrative that NZ's pastoral farming is a major contributor to the
planet's GHG emissions, the opposite is in fact the case. Latest research can
demonstrate that NZ red meat and dairy product exports make a major
contribution to GHG emissions minimisation. (It is likely that the
anti-farming narrative has a lot to do with the Vegan
agenda rather than simply GHG emissions concerns)!
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© 2022-2023 Copyright - NZAgri.com All rights reserved
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|